Nov 01 2011

Census on Wheels

Published by under About Bikes,Public Announcements

 

recently said this about bikes in the world of transit sans auto….

With the release of the 2009 Census this September, we now have data that can feed decisions regarding regional transportation and the design of pedestrian and biking options.

“The Brookings Institute recently found that while seven-tenths of metropolitan residents live within in a three-quarter mile radius of public transit, only 30 percent of jobs are accessible within 90 minutes by using it.”

 10 Cities Where Workers Most Use Public Transit: Census Huffington Post

Articles that have run with cultural background of commuters have been overplayed.

It is true that foreign born populations use mass-transit more than native born residents.  While many countries have far superior transportation infrastructure to the U.S. and urban densities lending themselves to the culture of carless commuting, the truth of the census statistics indicate other explanations. 10.8% of the foreign born commuters use mass transit versus a sad 4.1 for the native born, but of this statistically significantly higher population, these commuters were much more likely to come from families living below the poverty level, not own a car, and have no other options.

Other statistics may be intuitive to the urban planner and everyday citizen. Many are American stereotypes. Three fourths of commuters drive alone and from suburban areas. Of any racial group, whites are 10% higher of any commuters driving cars. New Yorkers ranked #1 for mass transit commuting with 30% of all their commuters. San Franciscowas second but with a distant 14.6%. (More at: US Census Reveals the Top 10 US Cities for Mass Transit Commuting: Inhabitat)

Of course we want the Census to feed us something One example that came from the 2009 numbers was the potential of 17–24 yr olds in New York and Oregon studying anything from Computer Science to Modern Dance.

The cities that gave us the highest that can drive design. What can we read from the statistics that inform a more intelligent urbanism? cycling and walking populations were Corvalis,Oregon and Ithaca, New York. Since these are college towns that’s no surprise. College students generally need to be frugal and live close to campus. However we now have the data to support urban development by way of significant pedestrian and biking services for those populations, knowing theywill make full use of them.

No responses yet

Sep 05 2011

30 MPH

Published by under Road Share Road Kill,Safety

Calm Enforcement

“DYING while cycling is three to five times more likely in America than in Denmark, Germany or the Netherlands”, is the opening sentence of recent article in the Economist.  The main point is motorist reaction times at 40mph is deadly for cyclists, children playing, the slow moving elderly and a felony added to the life of a driver.  This point seems lost on over entitled auto users and the following image was recently plastered onto the back of thousands of buses throughout NYC to drive the point home.

30 mph in NYC

 

The campaign includes three “videos” but one script.  The understandable hope for viral distribution is supported as it may prevent ordinary drivers from becoming felons.  All of them are here, one is below and all the details are in the Pedestrian Safety Study and Action Plan.  This includes recommendations for legislation authorizing the use of speed cameras, pilot programs to reduce speed limits in residential neighborhoods to 20 mph and street designs to increase pedestrian safety.

No responses yet

Aug 22 2011

Bike Design Process

Published by under Communication Systems

Oregon Manifest


American design and build competitions can drift into exploitations of the designer.   This one challenges the passionate bike builder and design firms to redefine the way we move.  The next Manifest fest and its (as yet) uncorrupted criteria for 2011 will take place in Portland on September 23 and 24, 2011.  Take a look…

 

No responses yet

Aug 15 2011

Published by under Communication Systems

The Dutch Way: Bicycles and Fresh Bread

While Europe is dealing with congestion and greenhouse gas buildup by turning urban centers into pedestrian zones, many American cities are carving out more parking spaces. In New York City, some are leased for other things, such as the creative tandem below, instant park, van-cafe, or the common-four-wheel-gas-user…

No responses yet

Mar 01 2011

Best Bike Cities

Published by under Communication Systems

Best Cities Link

There are many important things a city can do to gain Bicycle Mags attention for the list

You will find:

  1. segregated bike lanes
  2. municipal bike racks
  3. bike boulevards
  4. active cyclists probably with ear of the local government

To make Top 50

  1. city supports a diverse bike culture
  2. run smart, savvy bike shops
  3. other stuff

If your town isn’t named do something about it.

The magazine focused on cities of 100,000 or more and also list

5 foreign bike-friendly cities
5 American bike-friendly cities (under 100,000 pop.)

One response so far

Jan 14 2011

Best Rack

Published by under Communication Systems

Bike2.0
Nils SVEJE, Italy
Bike 2.0 is top level personal transportation ever.  Whether you use it as a substitute for a normal bike with battery and chain-less transmission,
or as a substitute for a far more polluting vehicle one thing is clear waiting for it is painful…

http://www.scdc.kr/e/gallery/e_3.htm

One response so far

Nov 27 2010

Best Bike Blogs

Published by under Communication Systems

Who has the best?

Is it:

Urbanely, or Cyclelicious, Velo Chic, Velo Vixens, Chic Cyclists, Girl on a Bicycle, The Town Bicycle, or Bikes and the City?

No responses yet

Nov 05 2010

American Biker (or wolf) in London

Published by under Britain,Europe

The American Biker (or wolf)  in London should read Crap Cycling & Walking in Waltham Forest. The consistency of this blog’s view is rewarding with good links to the groups that serve the rider.

Here is a brief sample:

PHOTO

“Black cab drivers (referring to the cab, not the driver) are a pampered minority whose relevance to moving people around central London is very questionable. As a cycling blogger once observed:

Taxis carry just 0.6% of all commuters in central London. Yet taxis are allowed to take up a huge and disproportionate amount of the road space, including being given access to the bus lanes. Why is this?

It’s a good question. The black cab lobby exercises an influence out of all proportion to its significance to personal mobility in London.”

One might ask the same question of the NYC  ”yellow cab”.  There is one benefit, they rarely leave Manhattan.

No responses yet

Sep 23 2010

Cycling to Success: Lessons from the Dutch

Published by under Europe,Netherlands

by: Jay Walljasper / Sep 23 2010

The following is reposted from www.Citiwire.net which covers a wide range of fascinating stories about urban life and community development.  It is rare to see one on bikes.

Jay Walljasper

I joined a team of latter-day explorers in the Netherlands this month on a quest to discover what American communities can learn from the Dutch about transforming bicycling in the United States from the largely recreational pastime it is today to an integral part of our transportation system.

Patrick Seidler, vice-chairman of the Bikes Belong Foundation, sponsor of this fact-finding mission for transportation officials from the San Francisco Bay Area, announced we were in search of the “27 percent solution” — the health, environmental, economic and community benefits gained in a nation where more than a quarter of all daily trips are made on bicycle.

Of course, the bicycle enjoys certain advantages in the Netherlands, notably a flat landscape and a long cycling tradition.

But the idea of learning from the success of the Dutch is not far-fetched. The Netherlands resembles the United States as a prosperous, technologically advanced nation where a huge share of the population owns automobiles. But they don’t drive their cars each and every time they leave home — thanks to common sense transportation policies where biking and transit are promoted as an attractive alternative.

Our trip started in Utrecht, where our group marveled at the parade of bicyclists swooshing past on bikeways separated from the streets. Immediately, we were asking each other: This raised the immediate question among for us: Why is biking a way of life in the Netherlands and only a tiny portion of the transportation picture in U.S.?

We uncovered a big piece of the answer that afternoon at a suburban primary school, where Principal Peter Kooy told us that 95 percent of older students — kids in the 10-12 age range — bike to school at least some of the time. Compare that to the 15 percent who either walk or bike to school in the United States, down, alarmingly, from 50 percent in 1970, according to the National Center for Safe Routes to School program.

That statistic alone helps explain the childhood obesity epidemic in the U.S., and also why so few adult Americans today ride a bike to work or to do errands — a mere one percent of daily trips.

The success of cycling in the Netherlands can be attributed to what happens in school. A municipal program in Utrecht sends special teachers into the schools to conduct bike classes, and students go to Trafficgarden, a miniature city complete city with roads, sidewalks and busy intersections where students hone their pedestrian, biking and driving skills (in non-motorized pedal cars).

These kinds of programs would make a huge difference in the United States, where 60 percent of people tell pollsters they would like to bike regularly if they felt safer — but only eight percent actually do.

A commitment to biking is not uniquely imprinted in the Dutch DNA. It is the result of a conscious push that began in the 1970s. As Hillie Talens of C.R.O.W. (a transportation organization focusing on infrastructure and public space) reminded us, it took the Dutch 35 years to construct the ambitious bicycle system we see today. In the mid-1970s biking was at a low point in the country and declining fast. Even Amsterdam turned to an American for a plan to rip an expressway through its beautiful central city. But the oil crises of that time convinced the country that they needed to lessen their dependence on imported oil.

The Dutch gradually turned things around by embracing a different vision for their cities. While the country’s wealth, population and levels of car ownership have continued to grow through the decades, the share of trips made by cars has not.

We could accomplish something similar in the United States, by enacting new plans to make urban cycling safer, easier — and absolutely mainstream. The morning and evening rush hour of cyclists in the Netherlands are not all the young, white, male ultra-fit athletes in spandex we are accustomed to seeing in the U.S. People of all ages and income levels use bicycles for everyday transportation, with more women biking than men.

“It’s one thing to read statistics about the Dutch biking,” observed David Chiu, president of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. “It’s another thing to see it happening; not just for hard-core bicyclists but as an everyday way of life for the majority of citizens. There is actually a road map of do-able public policies we can adopt to get us where the Dutch are today.”

Ed Reiskin, San Francisco’s Director of Public Works, added, “They don’t just think about bikes. Every presentation we heard tied things together — public transit, parking, cars, streets. The Dutch sense that people are going to do what’s easiest. If we think about how to improve the quality of biking, more people will bike.”

Bicycling is popular not only in the charming, old-fashioned centers of Dutch cities, but in newly built suburban areas as well. We caught a glimpse of a hopeful future for the world’s cities on Java Island, a cluster of neighborhoods constructed over the past 10 years in what was once the Amsterdam’s harbor. Motorized traffic is shunted to the side of each cluster of apartment buildings in underground parking garages, while pedestrians and bicyclists have free reign of the courtyards that link people’s homes.

You feel a liberating sense of ease in these new neighborhoods. I’ve never seen kids — even really young ones — who look so completely comfortable running around. We passed two sets of young girls staging tea parties, one of them on a blanket just inches from the joint biking/walking trail that served as the neighborhood’s main street.

Amsterdam city council member Fjodor Molenaar, who met up with us on Java Island, explained that the Dutch call this an “Auto Luw” development, which translates as “car light” or “car sparse,” adding that this planning idea is now the official policy of the city.


Jay Walljasper, author of The Great Neighborhood Book and All That We Share: A Field Guide to the Commons (due in January), is an associate of the Citistates Group, and co-editor of OnTheCommons.org. His website: JayWalljasper.com.

One other thing:

The New York City Bicycle Survey (2007) presents the major findings of our online survey, held for Bike Month 2006, and their implications for transportation and bicycle planning in the city. With over 1,000 survey respondents, the report documents several trends and key findings for cycling commutation, parking, and facilities in the city.

Download the Report ( 1.92 MB)
Here: http://home2.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/transportation/bike_survey.pdf

Even in NYC where the challenges are significant – makes the ongoing increase in ridership even more noteworthy.

One response so far

Aug 17 2010

What Came First, the Road or the Automobile?

Published by under Communication Systems

The reinvention of personalized transit into a multimodal car-like system is the first sign that the vehicle industry senses new limits.   The “morphing” has begun but the industry lacks a motive to produce standards sufficient to release its full potential.  The changes to date offer little more than an alternative to the “bumper-cars” system we have now.  Books like Reinventing the Automobile indicates this weakness, as the policy to date continues to focus on engines instead of movement.  This is backwards and needs to change.  

Why the “morphing”?  The refinement and distribution of a limited commodity such as crude oil occurs through private and reasonably competitive markets that set the price of energy.  These markets limit the purchase to buyers willing and able to pay the price not only for the fuel, but also for the engine and vehicle the fuel demands.  It is a form of rationing and morphing is a mere extension.  When scarcity occurs, public authorities impose rationing very differently.  It begins by imposing force with the appearance of fairness to preserve order but it does not end there.   The reason is quintessentially human, our wants and needs do not sense limits, only opportunity.  The failure to establish new limits is in effect a failure of governance.

Cyclists not only confront the fear of injury, but the horror of handing a charge of vehicular manslaughter to the driver of a car.  The roads are not ready for bikes, let alone a new variety of bumper cars no matter how smart they might pretend to be.  A Brooklyn Paper reporter, Andy Campbell identified a Williamsburg resident who was squirting superglue into bike locks because they littered the community for blocks around the Bedford Subway Station in Williamsburg, Brooklyn.  Now he is stuck with them.  The design response on the streets wherever a new vehicle occurs is pathetic.  The ability of these new vehicles to assimilate into existing movement systems is the next step in horror.

So Why Point Out This Book?William Mitchell runs the Smart Cities research group at MIT’s Media Lab.  He got together with Christopher Borroni-Bird, GM’s Director of Advanced Technology Vehicle Concepts to run innovative projects.  It is mutually beneficial as it encourages and discovers talent at MIT.  Lawrence Burns, the third contributor also hails from GM as its former Vice President of Research and Development at General Motors.  The book is presented here for its insight, and you are encouraged to peruse it for intent.  They look to the “electric-drive” and wireless systems as new kinds of engines hoping to encourage public investment in some kind of guidance and shared use system.  Read this book to see how backwards it presents the case. 

The road is made by walking.   It would be a good idea to start there first, and for the thoughtful people at MIT to consider the purpose of  investment capital must be to re-invent the road not the automobile.   This is not putting the cart before the horse.  It prioritizes human life.

No responses yet

Next »